By Matt Zapotosky Matt Zapotosky National security reporter covering the Justice Department Email Bio Follow July 19 at 2:22 PM Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen had calmly fended off more than a dozen questions — some of them about the crimi

Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen had calmly fended off more than a dozen questions — some of them about the criminal justice reform legislation he had planned to discuss, others on various controversies of the day — and begun to walk away from the stage. His first news conference as the Justice Department’s No. 2 official was nearly behind him.

Then a Fox News reporter asked how he felt about the House of Representatives’ vote this week to hold Rosen’s boss, Attorney General William P. Barr, in contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena related to the administration’s failed effort to include a question about citizenship on the 2020 Census.

Rosen returned to the lectern.

“We’re talking about what is, unfortunately, the crassest form of political theater, and from where I stand, I’m deeply disappointed that the House leadership would proceed in that way, with something that is so obviously beneath the dignity of the offices they hold,” Rosen said. “It’s really a new low for the current House of Representatives.”

The forceful comments were notable for an understated official who — since being confirmed to his post in May — has largely steered clear of the political drama that seems to constantly envelop the department he now leads. Throughout his first news conference, Rosen had assiduously avoided saying anything revelatory on topics other than the one he was there to discuss: implementation of the First Step Act, a criminal justice reform bill.

But on contempt, he leaned in.

“It’s not too late to reverse course,” he said. “The House of Representatives could reconsider, revoke its action and apologize to the attorney general, and that’s what they should do.”

[ 3,100 inmates to be released as Trump administration implements criminal justice reform ]

The relationship between Congress and the Justice Department had been fractured long before Rosen stepped to the stage Friday. Lawmakers have repeatedly accused the department of supporting the Trump administration’s bid to stonewall their requests for documents.

Tensions reached a boiling point this week when the House of Representatives voted along party lines to hold Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in criminal contempt over the census controversy .

The vote will have little practical effect. Those found in criminal contempt are referred to the Justice Department for prosecution, and it is not likely to prosecute its own boss. But the move has nonetheless rankled department leaders, who assert they have turned over thousands of documents to lawmakers and are withholding only those deemed privileged.

[ House votes to hold Attorney General Barr, Commerce Secretary Ross in contempt for failing to comply with subpoena on 2020 Census ]

Rosen noted Friday that the Supreme Court already stopped the citizenship question from being added to the census, and asserted the House had no real reason to investigate further.

“We’re talking about a matter, the census, in which the Supreme Court has already ruled and we’re done,” Rosen said. “So, the House has not identified some compelling legislative need for this. To the contrary, this makes no sense at all.”

On other contentious topics, Rosen was far more circumspect.

Asked if prosecutors’ closing the investigation into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s campaign finance violations meant that Trump had been “cleared of any wrongdoing,” Rosen responded, “The only thing I can say about that is that it was handled by experienced prosecutors who looked at the law and the facts and made their conclusions on the merits.”

Asked if he or Justice Department leadership in D.C. had played a role in prosecutors’ concluding the case, and whether Justice Department guidance that sitting presidents cannot be indicted had any impact, Rosen said: “I don’t have anything to add to what I just said.” The House Oversight Committee on Friday requested similar information from federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, which handled the Cohen case.

[ Trump spoke repeatedly with Cohen, aides amid scramble to pay Stormy Daniels, court documents show ]

Of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s testimony next week, Rosen merely pointed to what Mueller has said publicly.

“Special counsel Mueller held a news conference some weeks back where he indicated his report was his testimony, so I think it would be reasonable to assume or expect that he meant what he said,” Rosen said.

Notably, Rosen would not commit to making public the results of an internal Justice Department investigation into the handling of financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 plea agreement, which has come under significant scrutiny in recent weeks as Epstein has been indicted on new sex trafficking charges.

The agreement allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two state charges and spend just 13 months in jail, with work release privileges. It was approved by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who resigned as Trump’s labor secretary amid new controversy over the arrangement.

“I don’t have anything I want to share on that today,” Rosen said of whether he would commit to releasing the results of the Justice Department’s internal investigation.

A Justice Department official said after the news conference that the results of such investigations are generally made public when they are complete, and officials did not “see any reason” that would not be the case here. Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote in a letter to Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) in February that the department would share the results with him “as appropriate.”

Rosen spoke on the contempt vote for about two minutes, and then — after calling on Congress to apologize — left the stage for a second time. Again, he was tailed by a question, this one from a CNN reporter.

“Or, you could hand over documents, right?” the report asked.

Rosen did not respond.

Comment s Matt Zapotosky Matt Zapotosky covers the Justice Department for The Washington Post‘s national security team. He has previously worked covering the federal courthouse in Alexandria and local law enforcement in Prince George’s County and Southern Maryland. Follow Sign up for email updates from the “Confronting the Caliphate” series.

You have signed up for the “Confronting the Caliphate” series.

Thank you for signing up You‘ll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series. Most Read National 1 The DEA database: Find the data for where you live database 2 ‘He was basking in that moment like an iguana soaking up racist sun’: Late-night hosts rebuke Trump over rally chant 3 A remote Virginia valley has been flooded by prescription opioids 4 Female inmates were forced to expose their genitals in a ‘training exercise.’ It was legal, court rules. 5 Vatican bans W.Va. bishop accused of sexual and financial misconduct from public ministry Opinion New GOP panic about Trump’s racism reveals an ugly truth Opinion Padma Lakshmi: Millions of Americans like me and Ilhan Omar are right where we belong © 1996-2019 The Washington Post   Help Policies and Standards Terms of Service Privacy Policy Print Products Terms of Sale Digital Products Terms of Sale Submissions and Discussion Policy RSS Terms of Service Ad Choices Contact Us Read content from allstate Content from Allstate This content is paid for by an advertiser and published by WP BrandStudio. The Washington Post newsroom was not involved in the creation of this content. Learn more about WP BrandStudio. We went to the source. Here’s what matters to millennials. A state-by-state look at where Generation Y stands on the big issues. Subscriber sign in We noticed you’re blocking ads! Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker. Or purchase a subscription for unlimited access to real news you can count on. Try 1 month for $1 Unblock ads Questions about why you are seeing this? Contact us